The automotive financial landscape of 2025 represents a singular convergence of regulatory sunsets, inventory surpluses, and evolving consumer behavior. For the prospective lessee of an electric vehicle (EV), understanding the broader economic machinery is as critical as understanding the terms of a specific contract. We stand at the precipice of a fundamental regime change in how the United States government subsidizes the transition to electrification. The primary driver of this shift is the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025” (OBBBA), legislation that not only alters the tax code but establishes a definitive termination date for the subsidies that have artificially depressed EV lease prices for the past three years.
The Legislative Catalyst: The Sunset of Section 45W
Since the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) in 2022, the automotive industry has relied heavily on a specific provision within the Internal Revenue Code: Section 45W. This section, originally intended for commercial vehicles, created what industry analysts term the “Lease Loophole.” Unlike Section 30D—which governs consumer purchases and imposes strict income caps ($150,000 for single filers) and North American assembly requirements—Section 45W allows a commercial entity (the leasing company or bank) to claim a commercial clean vehicle credit of up to $7,500 regardless of where the vehicle was manufactured or the income of the end-user.
This loophole effectively democratized access to federal subsidies, allowing vehicles manufactured in South Korea (Hyundai/Kia), Germany (BMW/Mercedes), and Sweden (Volvo/Polestar) to remain price-competitive with domestically produced units like those from Tesla or General Motors. However, the OBBBA has introduced a “hard stop.” As of September 30, 2025, the Section 45W credit is repealed. This date acts as a fulcrum for the 2025 market. The first three quarters of the year are defined by a rush to capitalize on government-funded equity, while the fourth quarter creates a vacuum that manufacturers must fill with private capital to prevent a collapse in demand.
| Feature | Leasing (Section 45W) | Purchasing (Section 30D) |
| Federal Incentive | $7,500 (Commercial Credit) passed as Capital Cost Reduction. | $7,500 (New Clean Vehicle Credit) claimed on tax return or at POS. |
| Income Limits | None. (Loophole bypasses caps). | Single: $150k, Head of Household: $225k, Joint: $300k. |
| Vehicle Assembly | No Restriction. (Qualifies Korean/European EVs). | Must be assembled in North America. |
| Battery Sourcing | No Restriction. | Strict requirements on critical minerals/components. |
| MSRP Cap | None. | Cars: $55k, SUVs/Trucks: $80k. |
| Interest Deductibility | No (Repealed by OBBBA). | Yes (Up to $10k interest deduction under OBBBA). |
| Risk Profile | Low (Bank holds depreciation risk). | High (Owner holds depreciation/battery tech risk). |
The Inventory Crisis and Manufacturer Response
The macroeconomic environment is further complicated by a persistent supply glut. Following the supply chain normalizations of 2023 and 2024, manufacturers ramped up production just as high interest rates began to dampen consumer borrowing power. By late 2025, dealerships are grappling with significant “days supply” of inventory—the number of days it would take to sell current stock at the current sales rate. This oversupply is particularly acute in the EV sector, where early adopter demand has been satiated, and mass-market adoption faces resistance due to infrastructure concerns and price sensitivity.
To combat this stagnation, manufacturers have engaged in a frantic period of discounting. We are observing a bifurcation in pricing strategies: “Front-end” discounts, which reduce the selling price of the vehicle, and “Back-end” subvention, where the manufacturer artificially inflates the residual value or suppresses the money factor to engineer an attractive monthly payment. For the negotiator, identifying which lever a manufacturer is pulling is key to extracting value. For instance, while Ford deals with inventory buildup of the Mustang Mach-E and F-150 Lightning, they have resorted to aggressive subvented lease rates and substantial manufacturer rebates to move metal before the 2026 model year rollover.
Interest Rates and the Cost of Capital
The Federal Reserve’s monetary policy in 2025 continues to exert upward pressure on the “Money Factor”—the leasing equivalent of an interest rate. With the repeal of the car loan interest deduction for leases (the OBBBA allows interest deductions for purchases but explicitly excludes leases), the cost of borrowing has become a focal point of negotiation. High base interest rates mean that the floor for lease pricing is higher than in the previous decade. Consequently, a “good deal” in 2025 is mathematically different from a good deal in 2020. Lessees must recalibrate their expectations, understanding that a money factor equivalent to 5-6% APR is now considered “prime,” whereas previously it might have been viewed as predatory.
The Mathematics of Leasing
To negotiate effectively, one must move beyond the “monthly payment” and understand the underlying algebraic formula that dictates the cost of a lease. A lease is not a rental; it is a complex financing instrument where the consumer pays for the depreciation of an asset plus a rent charge on the capital tied up in that asset.
The Core Components
The lease payment is the sum of two distinct calculations: the Depreciation Charge and the Rent Charge (Finance Charge), plus applicable taxes.
Adjusted Capitalized Cost (Net Cap Cost)
The Capitalized Cost is the agreed-upon value of the vehicle. It serves as the principal balance of the loan. The “Gross Capitalized Cost” includes the negotiated selling price of the vehicle, the acquisition fee (charged by the bank to originate the lease), and any dealer fees or add-ons (such as window tint or protection packages).
The “Adjusted Capitalized Cost” is the Gross Cap Cost minus any “Capital Cost Reduction.” This reduction is the most critical variable for the lessee and is comprised of:
- Cash Down Payment: Money the lessee pays out of pocket (highly discouraged).
- Trade-In Equity: The value of a trade-in vehicle minus any existing loan balance.
- Rebates and Incentives: This includes the Section 45W tax credit ($7,500), loyalty cash, conquest cash, and other manufacturer incentives.
$$ \text{Net Cap Cost} = (\text{Selling Price} + \text{Fees}) – (\text{Rebates} + \text{Cash Down} + \text{Trade Equity}) $$
Residual Value
The Residual Value (RV) is the lender’s prediction of what the vehicle will be worth at the end of the lease term, expressed as a percentage of the MSRP (not the selling price).
- The Stability of MSRP: It is vital to note that the residual value is calculated based on the MSRP, a static number found on the Monroney sticker. Negotiating a lower selling price does not lower the residual dollar amount; instead, it narrows the gap between the Cap Cost and the Residual, reducing the total depreciation to be financed.
- Strategic Implication: A higher residual value results in lower monthly payments. However, in the volatile EV market of 2025, actual market depreciation often exceeds these residual predictions. Manufacturers often “subvent” (inflate) residuals to make leases attractive. This means the lessee is paying less depreciation than actually occurs, making the lease a powerful hedge against asset devaluation.
The Money Factor
The Money Factor (MF) is the financing rate. While often presented as a confusing decimal (e.g., 0.00250), it relates directly to the Annual Percentage Rate (APR).
$$\text{APR} = \text{Money Factor} \times 2400$$
This seemingly arbitrary multiplier of 2,400 is derived from the specific way interest is calculated on a monthly basis across the average balance of the loan. A Money Factor of 0.00250 is equivalent to a 6% APR ($0.00250 \times 2400 = 6.0$).
The Calculation Methodology
Understanding how these components interact allows the lessee to audit dealer worksheets for hidden markups.
Step 1: Calculate Monthly Depreciation
$$ \text{Monthly Depreciation} = \frac{\text{Net Cap Cost} – \text{Residual Value}}{\text{Lease Term (Months)}} $$
This portion of the payment pays down the principal difference between what the car costs now and what it will be worth later.
Step 2: Calculate Monthly Rent Charge
$$ \text{Monthly Rent Charge} = (\text{Net Cap Cost} + \text{Residual Value}) \times \text{Money Factor} $$
This step is counterintuitive to many. The rent charge is applied to the sum of the Net Cap Cost and the Residual Value. This is because the bank has capital tied up in the entire value of the vehicle, not just the portion being depreciated. Therefore, the lessee pays interest on the depreciation and the residual value.
Step 3: Calculate Taxes
In most states, sales tax is applied to the sum of the monthly depreciation and rent charge. However, in states like Texas or Virginia, tax may be levied on the full selling price of the vehicle, significantly altering the economics of the lease.
The Markup Vectors
Dealerships generate profit by manipulating variables within this formula. The two primary vectors for “back-end” profit are:
- Money Factor Markup: The manufacturer’s finance arm sets a “Buy Rate” (e.g., 0.00200) based on the lessee’s credit tier. The dealer may mark this up to a “Sell Rate” (e.g., 0.00250) and keep the difference as profit. Over a 36-month lease on a $50,000 vehicle, a 0.00050 markup can cost the lessee over $1,000 in additional interest.
| Scenario | Money Factor | Equivalent APR | Monthly Rent Charge | Total Interest Cost | Loss to Consumer |
| Base Buy Rate | 0.00200 | 4.80% | $160 | $5,760 | $0 |
| Dealer Markup | 0.00250 | 6.00% | $200 | $7,200 | $1,440 |
| High Markup | 0.00300 | 7.20% | $240 | $8,640 | $2,880 |
| (Note: Assumes Residual Value of $30,000. Rent Charge calculation is simplified for illustration: (Net Cap + Residual) * MF). |
- Fee Inflation: Dealers may insert “Market Adjustment Fees” or inflate the “Doc Fee” (Documentation Fee) beyond state averages. While acquisition fees are generally standardized by the lender, they too can sometimes carry a markup.
| Component | Negotiable? | Strategic Goal |
| Selling Price | Yes | Aggressively negotiate below invoice/MSRP. |
| Money Factor | Yes (via markup removal) | Demand the “Buy Rate” for your credit tier. |
| Residual Value | No | Select vehicles with naturally high or subvented residuals. |
| Acquisition Fee | Sometimes | Verify against the lender’s base fee. |
| Document Fee | No (usually) | If high, ask for a commensurate discount on Selling Price. |
| Add-ons | Yes | Refuse all non-essential add-ons (Nitrogen, Etching). |
The Regulatory Cliff: the September 30 Deadline
The expiration of the Section 45W credit on September 30, 2025, is the defining temporal constraint of the year. The OBBBA’s repeal of this provision creates a distinct “Before” and “After” market, necessitating different strategies for buyers depending on when they enter the market.
The Mechanics of the Section 45W Repeal
The OBBBA repeal is comprehensive. It states that no credit is available for vehicles acquired after September 30, 2025. This removes the government subsidy that has effectively lowered the cost of leasing mid-range and luxury EVs by approximately $208 per month ($7,500 divided by 36 months).
For the consumer, this means that any lease signed in Q4 2025 will lack this federal injection of equity unless the manufacturer chooses to replace it dollar-for-dollar from their own margins. We have already observed indications that manufacturers like General Motors and Ford are preparing for this cliff by attempting to “pre-fund” leases or offer alternative incentives, but the certainty of the federal guarantee will be gone.
The “Binding Written Contract” Loophole
For lessees who cannot take delivery of a vehicle before September 30—perhaps due to ordering a custom configuration or waiting for incoming inventory—there is a crucial safe harbor provision. The IRS guidance regarding the repeal allows taxpayers (or lessors) to demonstrate acquisition by entering into a binding written contract and making a payment on the vehicle on or before September 30, 2025.
- Definition of Binding: The contract must be enforceable under state law and generally requires a non-refundable deposit or a significant financial commitment (often defined as at least 5% of the contract price, though this varies by jurisdiction).
- Strategic Application: If a lessee orders a highly desirable vehicle like a Lucid Gravity or an updated Rivian R2 that is scheduled for delivery in November 2025, they must ensure that a binding lease agreement is executed and a deposit placed before the September deadline. A simple refundable reservation fee will likely not satisfy the IRS criteria for “acquisition”.
Manufacturer Response Strategies
As the deadline approaches, manufacturers are adopting divergent strategies to manage the transition.
- Inventory Flushing (Q2-Q3 2025): Expect aggressive lease deals in the summer of 2025. Manufacturers will want to clear 2025 model year inventory while the federal subsidy is still active. This will likely manifest as “Sign and Drive” events where the $7,500 credit is used to cover all drive-off costs.
- Subvention Replacement (Q4 2025): Post-September, manufacturers will likely increase “Retail Bonus Cash.” For example, Kia, which has heavily utilized the lease loophole to sell the EV9 and EV6, has already demonstrated a willingness to offer cash discounts of up to $10,000 to offset the loss of federal support. This effectively privatizes the subsidy. The risk for the consumer is that unlike the federal credit, which is guaranteed by law if eligibility is met, manufacturer rebates are discretionary and can be pulled at any time based on regional supply levels.
| Date | Event | Strategic Action |
| Jan 1 – Jun 30 | Inventory Build-Up | Target 2025 models with high “Days Supply.” Negotiate aggressive discounts. |
| July 4 | OBBBA Signed | Verify dealer compliance with new interest deduction rules for purchases. |
| Aug 1 – Sep 15 | Pre-Deadline Rush | Prime time to lease. Lock in Section 45W credits. Inventory tightens. |
| Sep 30, 2025 | SECTION 45W EXPIRES | Hard Deadline. Must have binding contract/possession to claim $7,500 lease credit. |
| Oct 1 – Dec 31 | Post-Subsidy Market | Look for “Manufacturer Replacement Incentives” (e.g., Retail Bonus Cash). |
Strategic Negotiation Protocols
Negotiation is an information war. The dealership possesses asymmetric information regarding the true cost of the vehicle (invoice price), the cost of funds (buy rate), and the hidden incentives (dealer cash). The lessee’s goal is to reduce this asymmetry through rigorous preparation and disciplined execution.
Phase 1: The Pre-Contact Research
Before a single email is sent, the lessee must construct a “Target Deal.” This is a mathematical projection of what the lease should cost based on market data.
- Identify the Control Variables: Visit forums such as LeaseHackr or Edmunds to locate the current month’s Residual Value (RV) and Money Factor (MF) for the specific trim level and term (e.g., 36 months/10k miles).
- Inventory Analysis: Search local dealer inventory to find units that have been sitting on the lot for extended periods (60+ days). These units are “distressed inventory,” and dealers are often motivated to release them to avoid floorplan interest costs.
- Incentive Stacking: Compile a list of all available rebates.
- Federal: $7,500 Section 45W (until Sept 30).
- State: ZEV credits (e.g., Colorado’s $5,000 credit, California’s CVRP).
- Affiliate: Costco Auto Program members often qualify for an additional $1,000–$2,000 deduction.
- Loyalty/Conquest: Discounts for current owners or those switching brands.
Phase 2: The Digital Inquiry
The days of walking onto a lot to negotiate are over. Physical presence signals a willingness to buy emotionally. Digital negotiation signals a willingness to buy analytically.
- The Initial Outreach: Send inquiries to 5-10 dealerships within a 100-mile radius. The message should be specific:”I am interested in Stock #12345. I qualify for Tier 1 credit. I am looking for a 36/10 lease. Please provide a lease worksheet detailing the selling price, money factor, residual value, and a breakdown of all applied rebates. I am ready to sign immediately if the numbers align with my research.”
- Avoiding the “Four Square”: Dealers will often respond with a “Four Square” worksheet that highlights the monthly payment while obscuring the selling price and money factor. They may ask, “What monthly payment are you looking for?” The correct response is, “I am not focused on the monthly payment; I am focused on the capitalized cost and the money factor. Please provide those details”.
Phase 3: Analyzing the “First Pencil”
The “First Pencil” is the dealer’s initial offer. It is almost invariably marked up.
- The Money Factor Audit: Convert the quoted MF to APR. If the dealer quotes 0.00300 (7.2%) but the buy rate is 0.00250 (6.0%), there is a markup. The negotiator must say: “I know the buy rate for Tier 1 credit is 0.00250. I will not pay a marked-up rate. Please recalculate using the base rate”.
- The Selling Price Check: Ensure the discount is applied to the pre-incentive price. A common trick is to show a “Discount” that is merely the $7,500 tax credit re-labeled. The dealer contribution should be in addition to the rebates.
- The Fee Scrub: Identify “junk fees.” Nitrogen tires, VIN etching, and “LoJack” are high-margin add-ons. If the dealer insists they are “hard-added” to the car, negotiate the selling price down further to offset their cost.
Checkout: 5 Common Mistakes to Avoid When Buying Your First Affordable EV
Phase 4: Closing the Deal
Once the numbers are agreed upon via email, ask for a “Buyer’s Order” or detailed lease worksheet to be sent as a PDF. Review this document meticulously to ensure no numbers have changed. Only then should the lessee enter the dealership to sign the final paperwork.
Brand-Specific Leasing Ecosystems in 2025
The approach to negotiation must be tailored to the specific sales model and market position of the manufacturer. In 2025, we see distinct ecosystems emerging.
Hyundai and Kia: The High-Volume Aggressors
The Korean conglomerates have been the most aggressive users of the Section 45W loophole to overcome their lack of North American assembly eligibility for the purchase credit.
- Strategy: With the looming expiration of 45W, Hyundai and Kia have begun pivoting to massive “Customer Cash” offers. Reports indicate rebates as high as $11,000 on the Ioniq 5 and $10,000 on the Kia EV9.
- Negotiation Tactic: Because these rebates are so large, dealers often try to sell the car at MSRP, arguing the rebate is enough of a discount. This is false logic. The rebate is manufacturer money; the dealer loses nothing by offering it. The lessee should push for a 5-8% dealer discount before the $11,000 rebate is applied.
Tesla: The Non-Negotiable Algorithm
Tesla remains an outlier with its direct-to-consumer model. There is no dealer to negotiate with, but there is still strategy involved.
- Inventory Discounts: Tesla’s website lists “Inventory Vehicles” which are often demo units or existing stock priced lower than custom orders. In late 2025, as competition heats up, these inventory discounts have deepened.
- Zero Down Promotions: To combat high interest rates, Tesla has introduced “Zero Down” lease promotions for the Model Y, eliminating the initial cash outlay requirement that acts as a barrier to entry for many lessees.
- The Buyout Problem: It is critical to note that Tesla leases (specifically for the Model 3 and Model Y) do not include a purchase option. The lessee returns the car at the end of the term, with no ability to capture any positive equity. This makes the lease purely a rental agreement.
Legacy Domestic (Ford/GM): The Inventory Struggle
Ford and GM face a different challenge: dealership networks resistant to EV adoption and inventory piling up on lots.
- Strategy: Ford has utilized aggressive subvented rates (e.g., 0% APR equivalent money factors) on the Mustang Mach-E to clear stock. Dealers are often willing to negotiate heavily on the selling price of these units to get them off their floorplan.
- Tax Credit Retention: Unlike Hyundai, some GM dealers initially tried to retain the tax credit to offset high residual risks. However, market pressure has largely forced them to pass this through to the consumer. It is vital to verify this on the contract.
Luxury (BMW/Mercedes/Audi/Volvo)
The luxury segment relies heavily on “Loyalty” incentives.
- Stacking Logic: A BMW lease negotiation should start with the “Buy Rate” money factor, then subtract the “Lease Credit” (Section 45W), then subtract “Loyalty Cash” (for current owners), and finally subtract “Corporate Fleet” incentives (often available to employees of large companies). This “stack” can result in thousands of dollars in additional cap cost reduction.
- Subvented Leases: Mercedes-Benz has notably used high residual values on the EQS sedan to lower payments, despite the car’s actual market value dropping precipitously. This makes the EQS an excellent candidate for leasing but a terrible candidate for a lease buyout.
Advanced Financial Levers
For the sophisticated lessee, there are mechanisms beyond simple negotiation that can further optimize the financial structure of the lease.
Multiple Security Deposits (MSDs)
MSDs are a tool allowed by some lenders (notably Toyota Financial Services, BMW Financial Services, and Nissan/Infiniti) where the lessee puts down a refundable deposit (usually in increments of the monthly payment) to lower the Money Factor.
- The Math: Each deposit might lower the Money Factor by 0.00005. Putting down 7 security deposits (approx. $3,500) could lower the rate by 0.00035, saving hundreds of dollars in interest over the life of the lease.
- The ROI: The return on investment for MSDs is effectively tax-free and risk-free (assuming the lease is completed), often exceeding 10% APR equivalent, which beats most high-yield savings accounts.
One-Pay Leases
In a One-Pay lease, the lessee pays the entire total of the monthly payments upfront in a single lump sum.
- Benefit: Lenders typically offer a significant reduction in the Money Factor for One-Pay leases because the risk of default is eliminated.
- Risk Mitigation: Unlike a “Down Payment,” a One-Pay lease payment sits in an escrow-like status. If the car is totaled, the pro-rated amount of the pre-payment is refunded to the lessee (subject to the specific gap insurance terms of the lender). This makes it a safer way to deploy capital than a capitalized cost reduction.
The Immediate Buyout Strategy
Some buyers use leasing solely as a mechanism to capture the $7,500 tax credit for a car they intend to own.
- The Process: The buyer leases the car to get the $7,500 Section 45W credit applied as a cap cost reduction. Then, within the first month, they initiate a “Lease Buyout.”
- The Economics: By doing this, they secure the $7,500 discount that they might not have qualified for via a direct purchase (due to income or assembly restrictions). However, they must watch for “Early Termination Fees” or specific lender rules that disallow buyouts in the first few months.
Pitfalls, Scams, and Compliance
The opaque nature of leasing allows for specific predatory practices that 2025 buyers must be vigilant against.
The “Monthly Payment” Shell Game
The most pervasive tactic is focusing the consumer on a monthly payment target. If a buyer states they want to pay $500/month, the dealer may manipulate the lease term (extending it to 48 or 60 months) or increase the cash down payment to hit that figure, while actually raising the selling price of the car.
- Defense: Never negotiate on the monthly payment. Negotiate the Net Cap Cost and the Money Factor. The payment is simply the mathematical result of these inputs.
Tax Credit Theft
Some dealers engage in a practice where they claim the manufacturer rebate or tax credit is “their” discount. For example, if a car has a $7,500 rebate, the dealer might offer a “Discount of $7,500 off MSRP” and claim they are giving you a great deal. In reality, they are selling the car at full MSRP and simply applying the rebate that the manufacturer provided.
- Defense: Demand to see the “Dealer Discount” and the “Rebates” as separate line items. A proper deal should show: MSRP – Dealer Discount – Rebates = Net Cap Cost.
Trade-In Undervaluation and Equity Theft
When a lessee trades in a vehicle, dealers often under-allow on the trade value or confuse the lessee about how the trade equity is applied. They may use the trade equity to pay for “Cap Cost Reduction” without explicitly stating it, effectively masking the fact that they are charging full price for the new car.
- Defense: Treat the trade-in as a separate transaction. Get a cash offer from CarMax or Carvana first. Negotiate the lease with no trade-in. Once the lease price is locked, introduce the trade-in. If the dealer can’t match the external offer, sell the car elsewhere.
The Mileage Trap
Leasing a car with 10,000 miles per year when you drive 15,000 is a financial time bomb. Excess mileage fees in 2025 have risen to $0.25–$0.30 per mile on many models.
- Defense: It is almost always cheaper to buy the miles upfront (which increases the residual depreciation slightly but at a lower cost per mile) than to pay the penalty at the end. Be realistic about driving habits.
Regional Markets & Incentives
The geography of the lease is as important as the timing. Regional incentives can radically alter the math.
The ZEV States (California, Colorado, etc.)
States that have adopted Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) mandates often have their own incentive programs.
- Colorado: Colorado offers one of the most generous state tax credits ($5,000) which can be assigned to the dealer at the point of sale for a lease, effectively acting as an additional $5,000 down payment.
- California: While the CVRP has evolved, regional air district rebates often still apply. Negotiators in these states should check for “stackability”—can the state rebate be combined with the federal 45W credit and manufacturer loyalty cash? In most cases, the answer is yes.
The Dealer Doc Fee Variance
Doc fees vary wildly by state due to local regulations.
- Capped States: In states like California ($85 cap) or New York ($175 cap), the doc fee is negligible.
- Uncapped States: In Florida or Virginia, doc fees can exceed $1,000. When negotiating in an uncapped state, the lessee must view the Doc Fee as part of the selling price. If the dealer charges a $1,000 doc fee, the discount on the car needs to be $1,000 deeper to compensate.
Checkout: Leasing vs. Buying an EV: A Financial Breakdown for the Budget-Conscious Driver
Conclusion
The year 2025 presents a complex, high-stakes environment for the EV lessee. It is a market defined by contradictions: massive inventory gluts existing alongside high interest rates; generous federal subsidies coexisting with their imminent legislative repeal.
Success in this environment requires a pivot from passive consumption to active financial structuring. The “Lease Loophole” of Section 45W remains the most powerful tool in the buyer’s arsenal, but its utility is finite, expiring precisely on September 30, 2025. The astute negotiator will leverage this deadline to extract maximum value in Q2 and Q3, utilizing the threat of the “inventory cliff” to force dealer concessions.
By isolating the variables of the lease equation—demanding the buy rate on the Money Factor, maximizing Capital Cost Reduction through rebates rather than cash, and ensuring the proper application of residual values—the consumer can secure a vehicle at a cost of ownership that defies the inflationary trends of the broader economy. The era of the “easy” EV lease is ending; the era of the “strategic” EV lease has begun.